The Fallacy of Originality
Mechanical reproduction fundamentally alters how we perceive and value art.
Quote
The uniqueness of the original object resides in the fact that it has been there. This is no longer so. Its uniqueness has been destroyed. Its value as a cult object has been destroyed. Its value as a commodity has been increased.
Berger says that mechanical reproduction (photography, printing, film) changed art forever. Before, an artwork's meaning was tied to its physical presence in one place and time. Seeing it was a unique experience. Reproduction, though, takes the image out of its original setting, making it common and easy to access. This makes art more democratic, but it also takes away the 'original's' special quality and cult value. The 'original' becomes a relic; its authenticity now comes from its physical history, not its unique visual impact, whi...
Supporting evidence
Berger illustrates this by comparing the experience of seeing a painting in a church or private collection (where its meaning was tied to ritual or ownership) versus seeing a photograph of the same painting in a book or on a postcard. The latter allows for a different, often more analytical, engagement but divorces the image from its original, intended impact.
Apply this
When encountering art, especially famous works, consider how much of your perception is shaped by reproductions you've seen versus the actual physical object. Challenge the inherent reverence for the 'original' and analyze how its meaning changes across different mediums and contexts.









