William H. Gass (1995)
Genre
Literary Fiction
Reading Time
1500 min
Key Themes
See below
Sign in to track this book
A middle-aged professor finishes a study on Nazi Germany, then digs into his own life, hatreds, and unhappiness instead of writing the introduction to his book.
The novel begins with William Frederick Kohler, a middle-aged, married history professor, in his study. He has just finished his academic work, "Guilt and Innocence in Hitler's Germany," a project that took decades. Instead of writing the introduction, Kohler starts writing a personal story he calls 'The Tunnel.' This secret project becomes his obsession, a deep look into his own mind, memory, and biases, while his wife, Martha, and his academic duties fade away. His study, full of books and papers, becomes the place for this often unsettling self-exploration, where writing is an act of defiant, private creation.
Kohler sometimes adds reflections on his main work, "Guilt and Innocence in Hitler's Germany," into his personal story. He talks about its difficult creation, the research, and the intellectual effort, but he sees it with a sense of distance and doubt. He thinks about how it will be received, imagining praise and criticism, but ultimately dismisses academic interpretations as shallow. For Kohler, the book is a finished thing, a monument to an intellectual pursuit, but one that did not satisfy his deeper needs. He hints at the personal cost of writing it and the compromises he made, suggesting that the 'truth' he sought in history was hard to find, perhaps even unimportant, compared to the 'truth' he now seeks in his tunnel.
As Kohler digs into his 'tunnel,' he uncovers clear, often painful, memories of his childhood. He focuses on his parents: his strict, emotionally distant German father, who taught him discipline and ambition, and his seemingly weak but manipulative mother. Their marriage is shown as full of unspoken tensions, resentments, and a lack of real affection. Kohler's memories are not nostalgic but analytical, breaking down their flaws, their effect on him, and where his own psychological issues came from. He sees his parents as types, showing parts of German culture and the human condition, and their influence affects his adult life and academic work.
A large part of Kohler's 'tunnel' is about his experiences during World War II, specifically his childhood in Germany and his later observations of the Nazi regime. He describes the widespread fear, propaganda, and the quiet acceptance of hatred. These memories are not a simple timeline but broken, impressionistic scenes, filled with his adult understanding and moral disgust. He grapples with the involvement of ordinary people, the tempting power of ideology, and the deep moral decay of that time. This period is tied to his later work on "Guilt and Innocence," but in his 'tunnel,' he explores the personal, raw impact of these events on his developing mind, often blurring the lines between victim and observer, and even perpetrator in his own mind.
Kohler's 'tunnel' also lets him bitterly criticize the academic world he is in. He sees his colleagues as shallow, self-important, and intellectually weak, more concerned with job security and fame than with real learning. He mocks their publications, conferences, and small rivalries, showing the university as a place of mediocrity and hypocrisy. This part shows Kohler's deep separation from his professional life and his dislike for the institutions that shaped his career. He sees himself as a smart person surrounded by lesser ones, and his 'tunnel' becomes a private space where he can express his raw scorn and intellectual arrogance, free from academic rules.
Martha, Kohler's wife, appears often in his 'tunnel,' though he describes her mainly through his critical, often cruel, view. He portrays her as boring, demanding, and without intellectual curiosity, a constant source of annoyance and an obstacle to his true goals. He resents her domesticity, her physical presence, and her attempts at connection, which he sees as intrusions. Their marriage is marked by deep emotional distance, a lack of communication, and Kohler's simmering resentment. He analyzes her appearance, habits, and perceived flaws with a chilling detachment, using her to highlight his own intellectual superiority and his deep unhappiness in their shared life.
One disturbing part of Kohler's 'tunnel' is his detailed explanation of his imaginary political group, "The Party of the World." This fictional party holds his most extreme, hateful, and fascistic beliefs. He outlines its rules, symbols, members, and goals, which involve a radical cleansing of society and the removal of all he sees as weak, ugly, or impure. The Party shows his deep-seated hatreds, his desire for control, and his intellectualized racism. It represents a terrifying outlet for his darkest urges, letting him build a world where his prejudices are not only right but also a guiding philosophy, showing the deep moral decay beneath his academic surface.
Throughout his 'tunnel,' Kohler deals with his sexuality, often through disturbing fantasies and obsessions. He recalls fragmented memories of past sexual encounters, which usually lack real connection and are often mixed with aggression or disgust. He focuses on the female body, dissecting it with a clinical, almost anatomical precision, often reducing women to objects of his intellectualized desire or contempt. These parts show a deep gap between his intellect and his emotions, and a troubled relationship with intimacy. His fantasies often mix with his darker political thoughts, suggesting a link between his sexual repression, his dislike of women, and his fascistic tendencies, further exposing the twisted landscape of his inner world.
Kohler is very interested in language and writing. He constantly analyzes his own writing, breaks down words, and thinks about the connection between language, thought, and reality. For him, language is both a tool for discovery and a trap, a way to express what cannot be expressed, yet also a barrier to true understanding. He tries different styles, tones, and forms, often including lists, diagrams, and unusual typography in his 'tunnel.' These thoughts show Gass's own concerns with how fiction works, as Kohler speaks about the very ways literature is made. The 'tunnel' itself shows his belief in language's power to change things, even as he admits its limits in capturing the full complexity of human experience.
Kohler's house and garden are more than just settings; they are extensions of his mind. The garden, which he watches from his study, often looks overgrown, neglected, or subject to his disapproval, reflecting his view of the outside world and the chaos he sees. The house itself, especially his study, becomes a confined, introspective space, a place for his creative and destructive impulses. He describes the objects in it – books, papers, furniture – with careful, almost obsessive detail, giving them symbolic meaning. This constant connection between his inner world and his physical surroundings highlights the novel's themes of confinement, escape, and how our environment reflects and shapes our consciousness. The house becomes an image for his mind, and the tunnel a secret escape within its walls.
Kohler spends a lot of time anticipating and arguing against the critics of his academic work and, by extension, his 'tunnel.' He creates imaginary critics, gives them names and opinions, and then systematically takes apart their arguments, showing his intellectual superiority and his contempt for their narrow views. This imagined conversation serves several purposes: it lets Kohler explain his own ideas further, express his frustrations with academia, and assert his intellectual independence. It also shows his deep paranoia and his belief that he is always misunderstood. This part blurs the line between author and character, as Kohler's imaginary critics echo the real-world reception of complex literary works, including perhaps Gass's own.
Beyond personal history and academic critique, Kohler's 'tunnel' is a long thought on basic philosophical questions. He grapples with unhappiness, the meaninglessness of life, the burden of consciousness, and the elusive idea of the self. His thoughts are often bleak, nihilistic, and deeply pessimistic, reflecting his deep disappointment with humanity and the world. He often uses abstract language and complex philosophical ideas, weaving them into his personal story. These thoughts are not detached academic exercises but deeply felt inquiries, born from his own suffering and his intellectual struggle to understand the human condition. The 'tunnel' becomes a place for him to confront the emptiness of existence and to express his own unique, often disturbing, philosophy of life.
For Kohler, writing the 'tunnel' is more than just creating literature; it becomes his main way of existing. He calls himself 'a man of words,' and his identity is tied to the sentences he writes. The physical act of writing – the pen, the paper, the ink – becomes sacred. He finds comfort, purpose, and a strange sense of freedom within his written world, even as his outside life falls apart. This theme emphasizes the novel's meta-fictional nature, as Kohler's struggle to write reflects Gass's own large undertaking. The 'tunnel' is not just a story but a living thing, showing how language can build and keep a self, no matter how broken or unsettling that self may be.
The novel does not offer a clear solution or a definite end to Kohler's story. Instead, it ends with him still deep in his 'tunnel,' the digging still going on. There is no sense of finishing or relief, but rather a continuation of the intellectual and psychological journey. The act of writing continues, reflecting the endless nature of self-exploration and the impossibility of fully understanding oneself. The 'tunnel' remains open-ended, showing the constant flow of thought, memory, and language. The final impression is of a mind constantly working, always dissecting, analyzing, and building its own reality, leaving the reader with the profound, unsettling feeling that Kohler's underground journey will continue indefinitely.
The Protagonist
Kohler's arc is less about transformation and more about deepening excavation; he descends further into his own psyche, revealing rather than resolving his complex and often repulsive inner world.
The Supporting
Martha's character remains largely static, serving as a consistent, if often maligned, presence in Kohler's life, her development unexplored from his self-centered viewpoint.
The Supporting/Mentioned
His character exists primarily as a formative influence in Kohler's past, his personal arc already complete before the novel's timeline.
The Supporting/Mentioned
Like his father, her character is explored through Kohler's memories, serving as a static influence from his past.
The Mentioned
They are static figures, serving as archetypes of academic mediocrity in Kohler's internal monologue.
The Mentioned
They exist solely within Kohler's imagination, serving as rhetorical devices rather than developing characters.
The Mentioned
She is a static memory, serving as a trigger for Kohler's reflections on past sexual encounters.
Hatred is perhaps the most widespread and strong theme in "The Tunnel." Kohler's 'tunnel' is an exploration of his own deep hatred of people, anti-Semitism, and fascistic leanings. He openly expresses his contempt for almost everyone and everything, from his wife and colleagues to entire groups of people. The novel looks at how hatred can be made intellectual, showing how Kohler builds complex philosophical reasons for his biases, especially in his 'Party of the World' sections. This theme is closely linked to his historical work on Nazi Germany, suggesting that the very subject he studies has seeped into and corrupted his soul, blurring the lines between objective analysis and personal identification. It forces the reader to face the subtle ways hatred can appear and be explained away in an intelligent mind.
“For I am a man of hate. I have hated my life, my family, my friends, my work, my wife, my body, my past, my present, my future. I have hated the world and all its works. I have hated God and man. I have hated myself.”
Language is not just a tool in "The Tunnel"; it is a main topic. Kohler, as a professor and writer, is very aware of language's power to create, destroy, hide, and reveal. He constantly analyzes words, explores where they come from, and plays with their sounds and meanings. For Kohler, language is both a tool for strict intellectual analysis and a way to express his basest prejudices and desires. The 'tunnel' itself is an act of linguistic creation, showing that one can build an entire reality through words. However, the novel also questions language's limits, suggesting that even the most precise writing can fail to capture the full complexity of human experience or truly connect minds. The broken, experimental nature of the text itself shows this ongoing struggle with expressing oneself through language.
“Words are all we have. They are the tools of our trade, the bricks of our being. And yet they are so weak, so frail, so easily broken.”
The novel directly addresses history, guilt, and innocence, mainly through Kohler's academic work, "Guilt and Innocence in Hitler's Germany," and his personal thoughts on the war years. Kohler grapples with the weight of historical memory, especially the legacy of Nazism, and the question of individual and group responsibility. His intellectual project aims to break down these ideas, yet his own 'tunnel' shows his deep personal involvement, not necessarily in actions, but in thought and feeling. The theme explores how hard it is to be truly objective when faced with such huge historical trauma, and how personal biases can subtly (or openly) color how history is understood. It suggests that 'innocence' is a complex and often hard-to-find idea, especially when looking at the depths of human evil.
“Guilt and innocence, I had written, are but two sides of the same coin. And the coin is always made of suffering.”
Kohler is a deeply isolated character, both physically in his study and emotionally within his own mind. The 'tunnel' is a solitary act of self-exploration, a journey inward that further separates him from the outside world and other people. The novel explores the complexities of the self, showing it as broken, contradictory, and often unknowable, even to the person experiencing it. Kohler's intense self-reflection leads to a heightened awareness of his own consciousness, but also to a deeper sense of alienation. His relationships are marked by distance and resentment, and he seems unable to truly connect. The theme suggests that while self-knowledge is an important pursuit, it can also lead to unbearable loneliness and a self-centered existence, trapped within one's own mind.
“I live in my head, a city of words, and the only way out is through the tunnel.”
Unhappiness is a constant presence throughout "The Tunnel." Kohler is a deeply unhappy man, and his 'tunnel' is, in part, an attempt to understand and explain the reasons for his deep discontent. The novel explores unhappiness not as a temporary feeling, but as a fundamental part of existence, a basic aspect of being. Kohler analyzes various forms of unhappiness – from marital dissatisfaction and professional disappointment to a deeper, philosophical despair about the human condition itself. He seems to find a strange comfort in his unhappiness, using it to fuel his intellectual pursuits and to justify his hateful view of the world. This theme looks at the idea that for some, unhappiness is not something to be overcome, but a core part of their identity and intellectual framework.
“Unhappiness is my climate, my country, my soul. I live in it as a fish in water.”
A literal and metaphorical excavation into Kohler's psyche and past.
The 'tunnel' is both the title of Kohler's secret writing project and a powerful metaphor for his descent into his own consciousness. Physically, it refers to the act of writing, the pages filling up like earth being dug out. Metaphorically, it represents an inward journey, an excavation of memory, prejudice, desire, and intellectual debris. The tunnel is a hidden space, a sanctuary from the external world and his academic duties, allowing Kohler to explore his darkest thoughts without censure. It signifies a clandestine, subterranean exploration of the self, often leading to disturbing discoveries, and highlights the act of writing as a profound, isolating, and sometimes dangerous, form of self-creation.
The novel self-consciously draws attention to its own status as a work of fiction and the act of its creation.
Gass employs metafiction by making Kohler a writer who constantly reflects on the process and nature of writing. Kohler critiques his own prose, muses on language, and even anticipates the reception of his work, blurring the lines between author and character. The novel frequently breaks the fourth wall, addressing the reader directly or commenting on its own structure and thematic concerns. This device highlights the artificiality of storytelling, the construction of narrative, and the subjective nature of truth. It forces the reader to consider the novel not just as a story, but as an elaborate linguistic artifact, an exploration of the very act of literary creation itself.
The narrative mimics the flow of Kohler's thoughts, often fragmented and associative.
The novel's narrative style frequently employs stream of consciousness, immersing the reader directly into William Frederick Kohler's mind. The text often shifts abruptly between memories, philosophical musings, observations, and fantasies, mirroring the non-linear, associative nature of thought. Sentences can be long and complex, filled with digressions and parenthetical asides, reflecting Kohler's intricate intellectual processes. This device allows for a deep psychological portrayal of the protagonist, revealing his raw, unfiltered thoughts and emotions, however disturbing they may be. It creates an intimate, if often claustrophobic, experience, as the reader is trapped within the labyrinthine confines of Kohler's consciousness.
Frequent references to philosophy, literature, and history enrich the intellectual landscape.
Gass extensively uses intertextuality and allusion, weaving in references to a vast array of philosophical texts, literary works, historical figures, and cultural phenomena. Kohler's narrative is replete with echoes of Nietzsche, Wittgenstein, German philosophers, classical literature, and historical events, particularly those surrounding World War II and Nazism. This device enriches the intellectual depth of the novel, placing Kohler's personal struggles within a broader cultural and intellectual context. It also serves to characterize Kohler as a highly educated, if morally compromised, intellectual, and invites the reader to engage with the novel on multiple layers of meaning, recognizing the dense web of cultural and historical influences that shape his thought.
Unconventional use of fonts, layouts, and visual elements within the text.
The novel often deviates from conventional typography, employing different fonts, varying text sizes, unusual page layouts, and the inclusion of diagrams, lists, and visual poems. This experimentation is not merely stylistic; it reflects Kohler's fragmented mind and his attempts to capture thought in non-linear ways. It visually underscores the 'tunnel' as a unique, self-created artifact, distinct from traditional academic writing. This device draws attention to the physicality of the book as an object and challenges the reader's expectations of narrative, forcing a more active and visually engaged reading experience. It emphasizes the theme of language as a malleable and experimental medium.
“I am a man of the word, a word-man, and I have suffered the word to be made flesh, but not in me. I have suffered the word to become paper, and paper, as you know, burns.”
— Flick lamenting his identity as a writer and the ephemeral nature of his work.
“The past is a foreign country, and they do things differently there. But the present is also a foreign country, and so is the future.”
— Flick reflecting on the alienating nature of time itself.
“To be a philosopher is to be a kind of tunnel. You dig and dig and dig, and you never quite know where you're going to come out, or if you're going to come out at all.”
— Flick musing on the nature of philosophical inquiry and his own intellectual journey.
“Oh, my poor soul, what have I done to you? I have made you a house of words, and now you must live in it, among the ruins of my syntax.”
— Flick's self-deprecating reflection on his writing and its impact on his inner self.
“History is not what happened. History is what is said to have happened.”
— Flick's skeptical view on the construction and reliability of historical narratives.
“The world is a text, and we are its readers. But sometimes the text is unreadable, or written in a language we don't understand.”
— Flick contemplating the difficulty of interpreting reality and human experience.
“I am a professor of history, and I hate history. I hate its lies, its pretenses, its endless cycle of folly and blood.”
— Flick's deep-seated resentment towards his profession and the subject he teaches.
“Memory is a kind of hole in the mind, a place where things go to die, or to be reborn in a different, often distorted, shape.”
— Flick's cynical perspective on the nature of memory and its unreliability.
“We live in a world of surfaces, and we are always trying to penetrate them, to find the truth that lies beneath. But sometimes there is no truth, only more surface.”
— Flick's observation on the superficiality of existence and the elusive nature of truth.
“The greatest freedom is to be utterly alone, to be free from the demands of others, from the suffocating embrace of community.”
— Flick expressing his desire for solitude and his disdain for social connection.
“My words are like stones, heavy and hard, and I lay them down one by one, hoping to build something that will last. But I know they will crumble.”
— Flick's somber reflection on the futility of his literary endeavors.
“To be a man is to be a creature of desire, forever reaching for what is beyond our grasp, forever tormented by what we cannot have.”
— Flick's philosophical musing on the inherent nature of human desire and suffering.
“The world is full of noise, and I am trying to make sense of it, to find a pattern, a rhythm, a melody in the cacophony.”
— Flick attempting to impose order and meaning on the chaos of life.
“I have built a tunnel, a secret passage into my past, into the darkness of my own mind. And now I must walk through it, even if it leads to nowhere.”
— Flick acknowledging his journey into self-exploration, represented by the metaphorical tunnel.
Ready to see how well you understood this book? Take our interactive quiz with 10 questions.
William Howard Gass was an American novelist, short story writer, essayist, critic, and philosophy professor. He wrote three novels, three collections of short stories, a collection of novellas, and seven volumes of essays, three of which won National Book Critics Circle Award prizes and one of which, A Temple of Texts (2006), won the Truman Capote Award for Literary Criticism. His 1995 novel The Tunnel received the American Book Award. His 2013 novel Middle C won the 2015 William Dean Howells Medal.
